<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Chipcraftx on Cagri</title><link>https://cagri.dev/tags/chipcraftx/</link><description>Recent content in Chipcraftx on Cagri</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cagri.dev/tags/chipcraftx/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ChipCraftX</title><link>https://cagri.dev/posts/chipcraftx/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://cagri.dev/posts/chipcraftx/</guid><description>&lt;p>After a year of weekends, I&amp;rsquo;m finally releasing ChipCraftX and ChipCraftBrain. You can find it at &lt;a href="https://chipcraftx.io" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://chipcraftx.io&lt;/a>, or the arXiv paper at &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19856" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19856&lt;/a>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I built this to fix my own problem: I want to think and iterate on new computing paradigms, fast. Today there is no single tool that lets a computer architect do that. Most of the work goes into tooling, scripting, and stitching things together instead of the ideas worth proving. Iterating fast means fast prototypes, cycle-accurate simulation, RTL, and a long list of other things all working together. ChipCraftX aims to cover that path end to end:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>